Each year a special Christmas animal
Every year there’s a noticeable particular animal trend in Christmas card pictures. One year it was penguins, and they were everywhere. It’s been horses (often attached to stagecoaches),
occasionally stags, or even hedgehogs in recent years. Sheep and donkeys often get a look in, but at least they are there in the Gospel narrative. Cutesy polar bears were around last year (nothing to do with the Nativity, and quite a strain. A less cutesy animal is hard to imagine, possibly only the giant squid). Sometimes the animals are natural(istic), sometimes completely anthropomorphised (e.g. robins with waistcoats). This year, one Hampshire council has opted for a sixteen-foot neon marmot as its main Christmas display, baffling at least some of its residents (and I have to say I don’t warm to the rodent-type animals, however Christmassily dressed). I am still working from a very small sample, but I think this year’s animal may turn out to be a reindeer (again). Maybe there’s a cycle, like Chinese astrological animals, though evidently a different selection (I’ve never seen a Christmas ox, or heard of a Chinese Year of the hedgehog).
Cats and Christmas
Cats nearly always feature among the Christmas cards, even if they aren’t the main animal that year. A cosy scene with a fire, a chair, holly round the hearth and a cat curled up on a cushion : this seems to be an irresistible Christmas trope. Cats represent comfort and cosiness, practically a personification of hygge. You don’t even have to have a cat to understand the message here, and celebrating warmth and comfort in the middle of a dark winter antedates the Christian era. So there are lots of cats on Christmas cards; but (except for much later, especially twentieth-century versions) they are not present in the Bethlehem scene. (Someone actually said that about the marmot, and one can only agree. They aren’t native to Britain …. or Palestine.)
Cats are uncanonical
When I wrote a blog on animals in the psalms, I was slightly surprised to find there were no cats in the psalms at all. I was even more surprised, on extending my research, to find there were no cats in the Bible (this is making me feel like Edna Mode and ‘no capes’ in The Incredibles). There are obvious reasons for this. For a long time the Israelites were in Egypt as slaves. They preserved their difference and resisted integration by defining themselves against the Egyptians, in various ways. The Egyptians had a very striking cat-god; the Jews avoided cats, and did not have them in their houses.
The animals which are in the Bible
There are big cats in the Bible : mountain lions and proper lions, among the wild beasts and dwellers on the mountains. They are creatures which the psalmist prays to be delivered from. But he doesn’t mention domestic animals much. There are the ones which represent your wealth (sheep, cattle, goats), and there are the wild ones which are a threat to them (lions, wolves, packs of dogs). There are the (mostly) harmless and beautiful ones whose function is to demonstrate God’s beauty and power (everything else, including birds, fish monsters and hyraxes), but the fireside cat does not feature.
Putting the feline back into festive
Cat lovers are not to be thwarted, though. There are lots of books for children which tell the story of the Nativity from the point of view of the stable cat. There are books about adopting a kitten for Christmas, Christmas carols for cats and even a cat version of The Night Before Christmas. Here is a link to such things if you don’t believe me, and that is only one of many. That one actually says, disarmingly, ‘It is truly amazing how many great Cat Christmas books are available for the holidays’. Indeed it is.
Cats who walk by themselves
These are all fairly gentle and domesticated cats, though, and I have to say that I find the ‘otherness’ of cats is the main part of their charm. I like the way they leave you alone and have a certain aloofness, more like the Egyptian statues than the ones that look like a version of a teddy (I can feel myself shedding readers as I pursue this!).
A special cat in a special poem
I was lucky enough to read Christopher Smart’s lines on his cat Jeoffry when I was quite little. I didn’t understand them very well, but I was charmed, and the lines stuck in my mind. (I came across them in a wonderfully imaginative anthology of children’s verse edited by Louis Untermeyer.) Smart was a strange man who lived in the eighteenth century and spent a lot of time in an institution for the insane (I’m not calling it a ‘mental hospital’ at this date, as I suspect it was horrific), wrote various books and died eventually in a debtors’ prison. The lines on Jeoffry are from Jubilate Agno (Rejoice in the Lamb), which he wrote while in the madhouse, though it wasn’t published until 1939. Benjamin Britten set some of it to music (here’s a link).
Jubilate Agno, not quite like anything else
It’s a weird work, almost like a compendium. There are whole sections where each line starts with ‘Let’, and others where the first word is ‘For’, there are alphabetical sections, there are parts which are funny and other parts where it’s unbearably poignant. Each line is a single sentence, which lends the whole work a sort of declamatory character, despite its being so personal. Smart is a polymath. He knows a lot, but the charm is in how he puts it together. He is a most precise observer of the natural world, with plenty of time to observe it, and he sees references to God in everything. He is fascinated by language and music; he loves to make lists; he creates odd correspondences; he is a synaesthetic. He is completely original and uncompromising. Some of the time you can’t work out what he is talking about, but you feel that there is a key if only you could find it.
Jeoffry, a religious cat
Jeoffry is out of one of the ‘For’ sections, and the advantage of coming to this strange poem via Jeoffry is that it is such an acute and exact portrayal of a real, beloved cat. And of course he is a religious cat; the second line of this section is ‘For he is the servant of the living God, duly and daily serving him’. Smart describes him so vividly that you can see him ‘wreathing his body seven times round with elegant quickness’. It’s really difficult to quote from Smart because a lot of the effect is in the accumulation, and I would want to go on for too long, so I recommend looking it up (full text here), and I will just mention a couple more lines : ‘For in his morning orisons he loves the sun and the sun loves him. /For he is of the tribe of Tiger.’ Indeed he is, and William Blake would recognise him.
Putting cats back into the Bible
Smart thought that there should be cats in the Bible. Indeed, he tells us that they are there, brought out of Egypt where they were numerous and plentiful (sorry, Smart’s style is catching!) : ‘For the Lord commanded Moses concerning the cats at the departure of the Children of Israel from Egypt. /For every family had one cat at least in the bag.’ You will search for this in the book of Exodus totally in vain; it’s not Moses, it’s Smart. Smart feels that every home should have a cat because of its services in dealing with pests, but also ‘For every house is incompleat without him and a blessing is lacking in the spirit’, which is exactly what my eldest son would say of his cat today.
The practical point of cats is that they deter rats and mice, though Smart mentions this almost in passing, because he enjoys so many other aspects of Jeoffry. He does say though that the cat ‘made a great figure in Egypt for his signal services. /For he killed the Icneumon-rat very pernicious by land’, and in the mighty granaries of Egypt the cats must have been very useful. What did the Israelites do without cats, to protect their stores?
Apparently you can also use ferrets or weasels as pest-control, so one suggestion is that the Israelites had ‘house weasels’. I think these are, however, unlikely ever to figure as Christmas animals. Ferrets and weasels are always baddies (witness The Wind in the Willows), and fairly rat- and mouse-like themselves. Their size, their type of fur, and their faces are against them. (I cannot resist making another reference to the marmot.)
Christmas cats are here to stay. They mean comfort and luxuriating in it, which is what we all enjoy at Christmas (after singing our hearts out earlier, of course). We can only aspire to their total relaxation and satisfaction. I shall leave the last word to Smart and Jeoffry : ‘For he purrs in thankfulness, when God tells him he’s a good cat.’
© Kate Keefe and Music for Mass 2019. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Kate Keefe and Music for Mass, with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.