How lovely is your dwelling place (not mine, at the moment)

Moving house is a pain….

We are currently moving house,  possibly only for a short while, but we aren’t sure, so we have had to pack everything. That is extremely tedious, but even worse is unpacking. At least when you pack everything, it goes tidily into boxes, but when you unpack, you have to find a right place for all sorts of stuff that you rather wish you had never acquired.

soldiers pillaging house
Moving the contents out of your house is called    pillage
….partly because of what our houses mean to us

At least doing boring mechanical labour (shelving books, hanging clothes) leaves your mind free to wander (especially when you’ve found the CDs but can’t find anything to play them on yet – or, even worse, have the machine but not the flex….), so I was thinking about how important our living place is to us, and how much is wrapped up in the little word ‘house’.  I’m using it as a generic term.  There was a book in the Dr Seuss series that we had at home when my younger sisters and brother were small, called ‘Come over to my house‘, and I remember it went through all sorts of different sorts of dwellings in all different parts of the world, but the key point was : ‘Wherever you go, you will hear someone say,’Come over to my house! Come over and play!’ ‘, and I’m using it precisely like that, whether it’s a flat, a hut, a castle or anything else.  There are lots of occasions in the Bible where ‘house’ is taken to mean ‘family’, ‘clan’, ‘dependants’ or something along those lines, but I’m just discussing fixed physical dwelling places here.

‘Let us go to God’s house’

In dire need of distraction (and to prove to myself that I wasn’t just a beast of burden), I started wondering whether there was any relevant stuff in the psalms.  I couldn’t think of many examples off the top of my head.   What struck me was that nearly the only person who actually has a house, is God.  There’s all the polite arguing in the Bible between David and the Lord, and later Solomon, about whether God needs a house;  but God spends a lot of time pointing out that he made everything, so he could make a house if he wanted one.  ‘The earth is the Lord’s’ (Ps 23/24), so it’s all his dwelling place.  Once David and Solomon have palaces, they can’t bear that the Lord shouldn’t have something at least equally impressive, and the Temple gets built, to very careful and elaborate specifications.  This is all in other books of the Bible, though, rather than in the psalms.   They range from referring to God’s dwelling on the holy mountain, or in the clouds,  to everyone calling out ‘Glory!’ to the Lord in his temple, but the actual dwelling usually remains nebulous (very appropriate).

World with cloud flying above
God among the clouds, and the earth below
A place for the Lord

There is one psalm (131/132) which recaps the conversation between David and the Lord : David goes on sleep strike until he can find a suitable place for God; he has a house, so he feels that God should have a house. He locates the ark of the covenant, and then offers the Lord somewhere where David feels he will be comfortable and looked after properly.  The psalm endearingly makes God sound like someone finding his ideal home in a newspaper supplement or on line: ‘For the Lord has chosen Zion;/he has desired it for his dwelling: ‘This is my resting-place for ever,/here have I chosen to live.’  The rest of it consists of  God’s reciprocal promises to David, as though in gratitude for the lovely house he has been provided with.  We sing this psalm once a year, on the feast of the Assumption.

Nomads don’t have ‘houses’

The early psalms are written by nomad people, so there are no references to any settled dwelling for humans.  The psalmist’s aspiration is limited to lying in safety on a bed (Pss 3 and 4 ).  Later there are a couple of references to houses for people, as the authors reflect their own experience, but they are rare, less than half a dozen.  The princess travelling to marry the King is adjured to forget her father’s house (Ps 44/45), presumably because she is going to a better one.   The only other houses are in Ps 100/101, where the psalmist celebrates having his own place where he can arrange things the way he chooses: ‘ I will walk with blameless heart within my house…no man who practises deceit shall live within my house’; the psalm about David deciding to build a house for God; and the two psalms starting at 126/127, which emphasizes how central God is to any enterprise :  ‘Unless the Lord build the house, in vain do its builders labour.’.  The second of the pair is a celebration of the just man’s homelife (this is the psalm so often sung at weddings), with his wife in the heart of his house and his children surrounding the table (127/128).  There is a clear subconscious mental link between women and houses : you need a house to keep your wife in (‘at home the women’ Ps 67/68).  And if it’s your house, you say who can come in.

So one of the crucial differences between people and God is that God definitely has a house to which a person may be allowed access. From the very beginning, there is an idea that God has a settled place, even if man may not approach it (Moses goes up the mountain to find God, while everyone else won’t set foot there).  This is long before the building of the Temple.  The usual expression for God’s dwelling is God’s ‘holy place’ or ‘holy mountain’ (from Ps 3 on), specifically Mount Zion (from Ps 2 on), and some time later, Jerusalem (Ps 75/76).

Did Adam and Eve have a house?

God puts Adam and Eve in a garden, but there’s no mention of them needing any shelter, because they are safe from all danger and sufficiently warm even out in the open (until the serpent walks in, on his legs which he is soon to lose).  The garden has walls and gates, though, which is why they can be excluded from it, so it fulfils some of the requirements of a house.

Adam and Eve with serpent
Legs still there (for now)

We know the garden is very beautiful and well-watered, but there’s no indication of even a little shed, which is interesting, because they might have liked somewhere to keep the tools they had to help them cultivate the garden (as I was trying to find somewhere for secateurs and screwdrivers).

Just how lovely is your dwelling place, Lord?

We have no specifications for God’s own holy dwelling.  We know nothing about it, except that it is a wonderful place to be, and if you are there, there is nothing else which you want or need. ‘I love the house where you dwell ‘ (Ps 25/26).  ‘To be near God is my happiness’ (Ps 72/73).  ‘How lovely is your dwelling place’ (Ps 83/84).  It’s big, because it has courts in the plural, and there are trees growing in the courtyards (Pss 83/84, 91/92,, 95/96 and 133/134) .  It is peaceful and beautiful, and the food is good (Pss 22/23, 35/36, 67/68, 111/112).  It is full of singing and music (hurrah!) , and everyone is happy there (Pss 83/84, 86/87, 91/92, 117/118, 121/122 – there are lots of examples).  One day in God’s house is worth a thousand anywhere else (Ps 83/84), and even being at the gate or by the threshold is enough (Pss 83/84, 86/87).  So we have no details, but it is all infinitely desirable.

French mediaeval castle
A castle to feel safe in

The psalmist emphasizes different aspects of the Lord’s own dwelling depending on the circumstances he finds himself in.  Thus God’s house is described as a refuge or a fortress, a citadel, mountain fastness, tower, a stronghold, a sanctuary, a temple (I’m not giving references for these because they are so common) whenever the psalmist is singing in a dangerous situation or feeling under threat.   When you are in danger, being in God’s house is above all to be safe.  God himself is a fortress personified more than once (e.g. Ps 27/28).

Let me dwell in your tent (Ps 60/61)

I started by ascribing the lack of house-references to the psalmists being nomads.  Nomads live in tents (or even caves, Ps 73/74).  Just as our ideas about Christmas are affected by our own context, as I discussed in the bleak midwinter blog, so are our ideas about God, and indeed there is lots of evidence in the psalms for God living in a tent just like the psalmists do.   ‘Lord, who shall be admitted to your tent?’ (Ps 14/15) is a recurring question, meaning exactly the same thing as ‘Who shall climb the hill of the Lord?’ (Ps 23/24), because you can’t go where you aren’t welcome.

Beautiful tents
Glamping, mediaeval style

God’s tent is naturally impressive.  It is made of darkness and clouds (Ps 17/18); he has stretched out the heavens as a tent-cloth (Ps 103/104) – and you imagine a tent made of that beautiful dark blue with little gold stars embroidered on it.   Unlike the beloved painted ceilings or laboriously-placed glowstars  we might have to leave behind in a house-move (one day we’re going to have to abandon the under-the-sea mural in my youngest daughter’s bedroom, and it will be hard),  if it’s a tent, you can take it with you.  The whole world is God’s tent, under his canopy of stars and clouds.

All are welcome

Wherever God is based, tent, fortress, palace or mountain, there is always enough room for those he loves.   Psalm 67/68 lists all those who are welcome : the just, orphans, widows, prisoners. The wicked will perish, but God makes a special home for the lonely and the poor.  The women are settled comfortably and given jewels and finery (well, it’s a start).  Interestingly, as the psalm goes on, the doors get wider and wider.  In v3, the wicked perish at God’s presence,  by v7, rebels can live even though they are confined to a parched land, but by v19 God has taken captives, receiving men in tribute and ‘even those who rebel, into your dwelling, O Lord’.   God is still smiting his foes, but everyone else is welcome as soon as they choose to come, and this is what is striking about the portrayal of Zion : ‘In you all find their home’ (Ps 86/87), and everyone is happy to go there : ‘I rejoiced when I heard them say :’Let us go to God’s house.’ And now our feet are standing within your gates, O Jerusalem’ (Ps 121/122).

foxes in dens, birds in nests
Look at everything snuggled up in its own place
Once people move to settled homes (NT)

We can see how time has moved on and how lived experience is different in the New Testament, written so much later.  Jesus talks with seeming regret about having no house even though the animals do (Mtt 8 20, ‘Foxes have holes’ ), but Paul seems to have gone through dwelling in a house and now wants to return at least mentally to a more unsettled lifestyle, using the idea of not being settled here on earth to emphasize the need to place your eyes on eternity (Heb 13 14, ‘no abiding city’).  Paradoxically, this still shows how much our homes mean to us, because otherwise we wouldn’t need to be encouraged not to dwell on them even while dwelling in them.

mediaeval bedroom
How tidy a room can be with few possessions beyond a portable mummy

There’s nothing like moving for making you feel detached from your possessions.  You wave them off in their boxes, and especially if there is a long period before you get them back, you manage fine.  When they do reappear and you have to find places to unpack them into, then you wonder why you ever needed more than one white shirt etc.  That is your chance to give things away, if you are in a place with good charity shops or recycling facilities.

Unfortunately for us, books are the big exception.  It takes years to build up your collection, and once you have, you want to keep them.  All.   I am having to manage temporarily  with only a small number of my books, and it’s all right at the moment (I chose very carefully which ones I did bring, plus I have my Kindle), but I packed all the books I use for work becaue I really do need them every day.  They may be old and battered, but they are precious to me, and looking things up on the Net is no substitute (though it sometimes works).  So I hope, in the many mansions Jesus talks about in heaven, there will be plenty of bookshelves.

Monastic book shelves
Some people seem to have enough room on their bookshelves, but we never have had…yet

© Kate Keefe and Music for Mass 2019. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Kate Keefe and Music for Mass, with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

The perils of being a pedant

One letter or comma is enough to upset a pedant

The perils of being a pedant. I’ve just spent quite some time pondering the difference one letter and a comma make. I had two psalm responses to deal with : ‘O bless the Lord, my soul!’ and ‘Oh, bless the Lord, my soul!’  They are definitely different in feel but they have the same number of syllables and could theoretically be sung to the same tune.  I decided in the end that the difference was enough to warrant rewriting the Response tune, even though the words of the verses are the same.

Job surrounded by fierce animals
Now let me think…where did I put that comma?
Keeping the words exact

Why does it matter?  It matters because when I began setting the psalms, I wanted to set the words exactly as they appear in the Missal.  When I first started, I allowed myself a little leeway (partly because I only had a UK Missal and we were part of a congregation using the US Lectionary), but also because, having sung religious music all my life, I knew that composers were allowed to repeat or emphasize words if they felt the need.  Then the Church prescribed the new translation of the Mass, and when I looked at the guidelines in GIRM,  it turned out that there was no leeway at all.  You were supposed to write a tune for the words exactly as given.  Even the punctuation was sacrosanct, I discovered, including aberrant capital letters.  Unless the text with the music was exactly as the text in the Missal, no repetitions, no inversions, no added commas, no nothing, it would not be approved.  Luckily you only need to get a Mass setting approved, but I decided that if this was the Church’s line, I would have to stick to it.

What happens to you if you don’t keep the rules
No repetitions, no deviations, no hesitations

It’s not logical, as it means that you shouldn’t be able to use any of the great composers’ Mass settings any more (no Bach, no Palestrina, no Mozart, no Haydn; I doubt they observe this in the Vatican Choir), but there we are.  There are problems, too, as the Missal is not infallible, and I have to find a way of dealing with errors.  If it’s obviously a misprint, I’ll correct it, but often it’s punctuation, and it probably doesn’t bother anyone except me and my fellow pedants.  You need to be a nit-picker in digital music publishing, but it does make it difficult when you are forced to reproduce errors.  (That’s when being a pedant is really, really hard.)

No mentioning women, either

You also have no leeway over non-inclusive language.  I set it as written, but I have had to allow myself to comment if it’s particularly bad (All Saints, Holy Family, wedding psalms) or I will burst.

woman with ornate false beard
Struggling with non-inclusive language

Volmar the Vebmaster says that being so exact with the words is passive-aggressive, and he’s been on fancy management and character-type analysis courses, so he’s probably right, but I think that it would be difficult to draw an exact line on how far you would be prepared to alter the text, so it’s safer not to get into it.

Most people are not bothered by the differences between the national versions either, as usually you only need one missal/lectionary for any congregation, and you aren’t especially interested in the other versions.  Here being a pedant helps;  I find having four versions to compare and contrast every week sharpens my perception of the small differences.  The People’s Front of Judea are going to be the closest critics of the manifesto of the Judean Popular Front.

O table! The vocative ‘O’ that baffles all small Latin scholars

To return to my problem with the Responses : it’s not so much the spelling, I’ve concluded, as the comma.  ‘O bless the Lord, my soul!’ is more formal than ‘Oh bless the Lord, my soul!’, though I think I would not have felt the need to set them differently.  But ‘Oh, bless the Lord, my soul!’ needs a pause after the ‘Oh’, which alters the movement of the line. (‘O bless’ is the CAN version,  ‘Oh, bless’ is for OZ.  The US is ‘O bless the Lord’, but its verse words are 4/4, so the tune is different anyway, and the UK is ‘Bless the Lord, my soul! Lord God, how great you are’, which presents a whole new set of considerations.)

It’s the Response to Psalm 103/104, which is a wonderfully baggy psalm about Creation, expansive and sprawling, with verses of wildly varying length, totally impossible to tidy up into a small number of pages even in the compact version.  It’s like one of St Francis’ joyful litanies about the wonder of Creation, and it’s where the Pentecost psalm is taken from, where the Spirit is sent forth and everything starts budding and flourishing in profusion.  Having it as the Sunday psalm is a bit like having to sing Hadyn’s Creation in three minutes flat, or something from the Reduced Shakespeare Company.   It’s an awkward psalm to set and it is long to sing (five verses), but it’s so exuberant that I love it.

Pity to leave out the monsters

It seems strange to have (except the UK version) such a short Response, but I see it as a sort of arrow prayer that boils over from the contemplation of all God’s wonderful creatures enumerated in the verses.  Even with five verses, there’s far more left out than included, and sadly we lose one of my favourite bits.  Just after the ‘moving swarms past counting, living things great and small’ in the ocean in verse 3, the psalmist continues, ‘The ships are moving there/ and the monsters you made to play with,’ which I think is a wonderful line.

Map with sea monsters
Some of the sea monsters for God to play with
Punctuation pedants rule, OK?

This Response is unusual in having an exclamation mark after it as well (not for the US), which also affects the way I set it.  It makes me try to roll the end of the verse into the Response so that it sounds as though it’s a spontaneous outburst of praise, a genuine exclamation.  So many times the rubrics say ‘The people acclaim’ when all we are doing is saying ‘Amen’ (always with a full stop) or something similar, but this should be a proper acclamation.  Exclamation marks and full stops are significantly different things.  We pedants celebrate this sort of difference.

A full stop full of meaning (and stop)

Here is a very good example of precisely that.  One final reason why I like this psalm is because its last line is the same as the first  (Bless the Lord, my soul!) but this time with a full stop instead of the exclamation mark.  So the movement of the psalm is like this.   It starts with exultation and an exclamation.  Then the psalmist runs through a huge list of the wonders of Creation, bursting (more exclamation marks) into overt praise twice on the way (How many are your works, O Lord! […] May the glory of the Lord last for ever!).    He reflects on what he has been praising and makes a resolution: I will sing to the Lord all my life, make music to my God while I live (a wonderful resolution and the spirit all church musicians should strive for); and then he ends quietly : Bless the Lord, my soul.

This is the calm tone of someone who appreciates all the glory of Creation and now is reflecting upon it, like Wordsworth’s daffodils : emotion recollected in tranquillity.  And all from a full stop.  Being a pedant can be a pain, but it’s also very rewarding.

Fiddler with dancer
Hours of fun making music across a lifetime

 

© Kate Keefe and Music for Mass 2018. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Kate Keefe and Music for Mass, with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.